Texas AG Ken Paxton sued Snap Inc., alleging Snapchat exposed minors to explicit content while marketed as safe, and used 'Snapstreaks' to encourage compulsive use.
Snapchat is being sued by attorneys general across the country for allegedly enabling the grooming, sextortion, and sexual exploitation of minors. If your family was harmed, you may be entitled to substantial compensation.
Why families are taking action
Lawsuits and criminal cases allege that Snapchat's disappearing messages, "Quick Add" recommendations, and limited parental controls have allowed predators to contact, groom, and exploit children — and that internal reports of 10,000 sextortion complaints per month went unaddressed.
Monthly sextortion reports allegedly received by Snap by late 2022
Attorneys general have filed suit against Snap Inc. since 2024
Recovered nationwide for survivors of institutional sexual abuse
A nationwide pattern
A growing record of state actions, criminal prosecutions, and civil suits tied to Snapchat's role in child exploitation.
Texas AG Ken Paxton sued Snap Inc., alleging Snapchat exposed minors to explicit content while marketed as safe, and used 'Snapstreaks' to encourage compulsive use.
A former music teacher was charged with sexually exploiting and trafficking minors using Snapchat, including the upload of CSAM depicting a child under 10.
Kansas AG Kris Kobach sued Snap, alleging the company misrepresented the app's safety with '12+' ratings while exposing children to mature and harmful content.
Utah's Division of Consumer Protection sued Snap, alleging the app enabled sexual exploitation and digital addiction among minors.
Florida AG took legal action against Snap for allegedly failing to protect children, citing predators and drug dealers using the platform to target minors.
Parents sued Snap after a predator used 'Quick Add' to connect with their 12-year-old daughter, then used cartoon avatars and filters to disguise his age.
NM AG sued Snap, alleging Snapchat's design and algorithms made it easier to spread CSAM and helped predators engage in sextortion and child trafficking.
Matthew Goyder sentenced to 40 years for using Snapchat to coerce minors into sending explicit images while posing as a 14-year-old.
Do I have a case?
The platform itself may be liable for design choices that allegedly enabled grooming, sextortion, and child sexual abuse material.
The person who committed the abuse can be named as a defendant — even if they were never criminally charged.
If the abuser used their position (teacher, coach, clergy, etc.) to access the survivor through Snapchat, that institution may also be liable.
Recoverable Compensation
In addition to accountability, civil claims allow families to recover for the harm Snapchat allegedly enabled.
Statutes of limitations apply. The sooner you reach out, the more our network of trial attorneys can do to help.
Start My Free Confidential Review →